JISHINDESUJapan earthquakes, down to the local station
EN
Open interactive map
MenuMore
LOCAL EARTHQUAKE HISTORY

Tochigi earthquake and Shindo history in 2016

栃木県

This annual view includes only earthquakes from 2016 for which stations associated with Tochigi recorded Shindo.

Data period: 1 January–31 December 2016
Data period: 1 January–31 December 2016

In 2016, stations associated with Tochigi reported local Shindo for 173 earthquakes. The highest local level recorded that year was Shindo 5−.

Observed events1732016
Highest local Shindo5−2016
Data period: 1 January–31 December 2016 · 173 observed earthquakes

Observation history · 2016

This history counts earthquakes observed at stations in the place, not earthquakes whose epicentre lies inside its boundary. Counts can change as stations are updated and older or corrected observations are added.

2016 · Clear filters
First observation: Jan 15, 2015

Observed events by year

Choose a year to update the event history and local Shindo distribution.

All years
2016

Shindo observed in this place

The highest reading from stations in this place, not the maximum Shindo of the whole event.

All Shindo
199249316485−15+06−06+070
Reference model · not a forecast

Regional context

The context below uses the place's full available history and reference models; it is not part of the 2016 statistics.

Local seismic profile

Where the shaking usually comes from

Source regions of earthquakes observed here, ordered by the number of reports.

5−
Southern Ibaraki Prefecture茨城県南部
388
5+
Off the Coast of Fukushima Prefecture福島県沖
246
4
Off the Coast of Ibaraki Prefecture茨城県沖
194
4
Northern Ibaraki Prefecture茨城県北部
140
4
Northern Tochigi Prefecture栃木県北部
72
4
Northwestern Chiba Prefecture千葉県北西部
55
Reference model · not a forecast J-SHIS (NIED) · A09000

Earthquake scenarios affecting this place

Official J-SHIS models ranked for their potential impact on this prefecture.

J-SHIS / NIED

#1 means the model ranks highest in the J-SHIS result for this place under the same settings. It is not a ranking of which earthquake will happen next.

Magnitude on a card describes the size of the whole earthquake model, not the Shindo expected here. Local shaking also depends on distance, depth and ground conditions.

#1Subduction-zone earthquakeSagami Trough earthquakes (M8 class)相模トラフ沿いのM8クラスの地震

Modelled magnitude: M7.9–8.6

Read about this model
#2Major active faultOkubo fault大久保断層

Modelled magnitude: M7.0

Read about this model
#3Major active faultOta fault太田断層

Modelled magnitude: M6.9

Read about this model
#4Major active faultFukaya fault zone深谷断層帯

Modelled magnitude: M7.2

Read about this model
#5Major active faultUchinokomori fault内ノ籠断層

Modelled magnitude: M6.8

Read about this model
#6Other active faultShirakawa-seho fault zone白河西方断層帯

Modelled magnitude: M6.9

Read about this model
#7Major active faultAizu-bonchi-toen fault zone会津盆地東縁断層帯

Modelled magnitude: M7.0

Read about this model
#8Major active faultFukaya/Ayasegawa fault zone (All segment)深谷断層・綾瀬川断層(全体が同時に活動)

Modelled magnitude: M7.5

Read about this model
#9Major active faultFukaya/Ayasegawa fault zone (Fukaya fault zone/Kounosu-Ina segment)深谷断層・綾瀬川断層(深谷断層と鴻巣-伊奈区間が同時に活動)

Modelled magnitude: M7.4

Read about this model
#10Major active faultSekiya fault関谷断層

Modelled magnitude: M6.9

Read about this model
#11Subduction-zone earthquakeMega earthquakes along the Japan Trench (Great East Japan Earthquake 2011 type)日本海溝沿いの超巨大地震(東北地方太平洋沖型)

Modelled magnitude: M8.6–9.0

Read about this model
#12Major active faultFukaya/Ayasegawa fault zone (Kounosu-Ina segment/Ina-Kawaguchi segment)深谷断層・綾瀬川断層(鴻巣-伊奈区間と伊奈-川口区間が同時に活動)

Modelled magnitude: M7.0

Read about this model

J-SHIS 2020 model, 30-year period and Shindo 6-lower threshold. This is not a prediction of a particular earthquake. Source: J-SHIS (NIED); processed for presentation by JISHINDESU.

Local seismic profile

Municipalities in this prefecture

Municipalities with an observation history, ordered alphabetically. Counts depend on station coverage and the available data period; they are not a risk ranking.